Share your CUWSS Experience
Please share with us your experience after taking the CUWSS 642-732 exam, your materials, the way you learned, your recommendations… But please DO NOT share any information about the detail of the exam or your personal information, your score, exam date and location, your email…
Your posts are warmly welcome!
Please don’t ask for links to download copyright materials here…
anyone have the new dump?
Anyone have new dump
Failed for the second time. Anyone has newest questions? Ready to pay.
I m willing to purchase new passleader if I get 5-10 people to share with me. Each person should contribute 10 US dollars. I will share any updates until exam date of each person. People intrested please send request to wirelesstut@hotmail.com. My paypal is the same as the email. Best Regards Sikorka.
Failed yesterday with 736 Points. There are many…many new questions which I can not answered. We can try to collect the new questions.
The easiest was:
– What means OSHA?
– What is the best solution in an extreme environment? -> NEMA enclosure
but the others are really difficulty
– Screenshot from Spectrum Expert, which shows a peek at channel 1
– for what kind of customer is the requirement: data, guest access, etc….?
x health care
x hospital
x …….
x …….
– then something like: in a MASH, the mounting height from one AP is higher than the others, why?
Hi Sikorka,
Recently I bought dump from passguide. But the questions were completely old and they refused to refund. If you are sure passleader has new questions I am ready to pay.
Me to
I took the exam yesterday and scored 782.
As said before there are around 20 new questions!
@Ekas which dump you referred? AT 157q v.7? Please confirm.
Not v157 it’s v2!
Still not seen the new questions across a lot of other VCE or PDF’s
That should have been v2 not v7!
eg:
RF factor loss through 6dB material?
WLC with 50ap licences customer already has 50 autonomous, how to add?
Plus the previous mentioned
and lots more!
Can confirm, 157q dump no longer valid. Anyone tried this? Site says updated 2/3/16
http://www.itexamfox.com/642-732.html
It looks exactly the same site as I got mine from.
They must just lie regarding the ‘updated’ and should replace with ‘outdated’
I’m due to take this very soon, does anybody have a valid version. I will pay!
Anyone?
It looks like this site might be valid, but I have no method to open .VCE files
http://www.getfreedumps.com/index.php
Same question count as the below which is now invalid.
http://www.examcollection.com/cisco/Cisco.Lead2pass.642-732.v2013-06-15.by.AbouHamza.120q.vce.file.html
Anyone any news on valid papers?
if you dont have vce practice exam at learnexam.com/642-732-cuwss-abouhamza-120q/
I got the question:
– do you require channel bonding in order to get 300Mbps in 5GHz band?
and..
– I think it was related to WCS RF calibration data collection models. Answer (select two): Points, Linear, Locations, …?
– Infrastructure issues: Answer: cable length, qos, poe, bandwidth, …?
– RAP on the roof. The higher the better? MAP on a pole? clear line of sight between Root AP, LoS between MAPs?
.. and the same questions Meikel got above. Indeed 20+ unknown questions.. I failed with 778/804.
Any other questions you guys got?
How many client hops in a mesh network? (doesn’t specify in or outdoor)
reason for slower than expected data rates? every packet needs ack? distance from Ap? shared medium? legacy clients?
RRM has set power level to 1 on all APs.. Enable EDRRM? check DTPC? Enable TPC? should be statically set initially?
Yes.. I remember again, thanks :-)
anybody have some idea about the TPC question or the throughput question?
RAP on the roof is that is needs a clear LOS to first hop mesh
Hi Guys,
Recently I tried 642-732, can anyone send me dumps to compare if the new questions are there?
ugofodev @ gmail.com
Regards!
@hugo the current dumps are not valid. if you remember something new post it here as people are doing above.
@cuwss:
– I think the answer to the RRM (TPC) question is to check DTPC values. Because if you set minimum DTPC value to max power (30), the AP will send at max power, I tested it yesterday. You can set TPC to manually, but cannot actually “turn it off”.
@bollebos
-Possibly, DTPC is to suggest power levels to the client as far as I understand. Its possible TPC is set to fixed and not “auto” or “on demand”… which would in effect be enabling it? What do you think?
Passed today :) moving on tho IUWMS. Learn the concepts and all will go well. Quick reference guide and IP expert videos and Cisco Live Lessons are the way to go. ALso some great videos on Ciscolive
Good job cuwss, congrats :-)
You were right by the way, the min- and max settings under TPC are NOT DTPC values. DTPC concerns client negotiation (CCX).
Thanks :) I remember one too about AP licenses, the question is confusing but I think an additional 50 AP license needs to be added…
Yes, this question was regarding autonomous AP migration to lightweight, if I remember right. Its not possible to migrate any autonomous license to lw. So just buy extra licenses.
There was another one: What is the most limiting factor when using MESH? I doubt.. The backhaul? The 2.4GHz client itself? The 2.4GHz connection towards the client? I think the last one, but not sure.. Cannot find this in any Design guide. Thanks.
I struggled with that one too, its not really well documented, but based on this line in the design guide I think its the client, as the client coverage requirements dictate the bit rate:
A lower bit rate might allow a greater distance between MAPs, but there are likely to be gaps in the WLAN client coverage, and the capacity of the backhaul network is reduced. An increased bit rate for the backhaul network either requires more MAPs or results in a reduced SNR between MAPs, limiting mesh reliability and interconnection.
What’s the answer to the RRM (TPC) question?
Thanks cuwss, you’re the best :-)
Okay, one more to finish: A company has a Voice implementation. Now they do a SS for Location. What will be the consequence? Ap Footprint? more co-channel interference? User triangulation? …?I think user triangulation, but I can’t remember the other possible answers.. I doubt if my answer was right..
@Anonymous: I think RRM answer is TPC (“fixed” mode will turn TPC off)
Triangulation is correct – remember for location services the client needs to be heard from at least three AP’s each in different quadrants.
@ bolleboos: Thank you
What’s the answer to the question – reason for slower than expected data rates?
I think… As soon as ONE 802.11b client joins a 2.4GHz AP with 802.11g clients, the entire AP (and the directly surrounding APs in the neighborhood) will go into protection-mode, meaning RTS/CTS principle. This will slow down the connectivity of all connected 802.11g clients. So answer can be: “legacy clients”, but also “every packet needs ack”…
@cuwss: What’s your idea?
Update: “Legacy 802.11 clients” seem to be the very first 802.11 standard (with 1-2Mbps rate), before 802.11b. So answer to the above question will be “every packet needs ack” I think.
every packet does need an ack.. the question doesnt mention if there are 802.11n cients which can use block ACK… so i think you are right. I think the question is getting at the distinction between Data rates and throughput also.
Hmm, still not sure.. They are talking about “slower than expected”. So if you optimally configure your WLC, with all lower rates disabled (only 802.11n), clients close to the AP, etc, there’s still one factor you cannot control completely, which is… the free spectrum on which everyone can do what they want (f.i. interfere with a jammer)… So the answer would be “shared medium” then!
Remember your throughput will be half of your data rate. I run into this in the field alot where your client is expecting 54 Mbps because the data rate 54 Mbps but in reality (throughput) is about half which would be 22 Mbps. Also we remember the wireless medium is a shared medium. I believe the answer would be its a shared medium.
Hello dear friends, I must take this exam this week and that more study is very difficult to me from all the work I have to deliver every day. So I request the support of whoever can send any valid dump, as may be rendered in the last week of February or in March now.
I really appreciate wholeheartedly, you are very very kind.